<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhapsody Releases New Version, Becomes Napster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sirshannon.com/2005/04/27/rhapsody-releases-new-version-becomes-napster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sirshannon.com/2005/04/27/rhapsody-releases-new-version-becomes-napster/</link>
	<description>The truth doesn't care what I think.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sirshannon</title>
		<link>http://sirshannon.com/2005/04/27/rhapsody-releases-new-version-becomes-napster/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>sirshannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=136#comment-634</guid>
		<description>I would assume that means there is a new version, then.  I wouldn't know, I am a Yahoo! Music Unlimited user now.  Fuck Rhapsody.

[UPDATE] A friend of mine called to cancel Rhapsody (to switch to Yahoo!) about a month ago and was told that a new version would be out in a couple weeks and they would extend his subscription for free until the new version came out.  He installed Yahoo! Music Engine anyway, which was a good thing, because the guy who promised him he would get Rhapsody for free until the new version came out apparently lied.

Tell me how the new version is, when you try it. 

I still suggest you switch to the cheaper Yahoo! Music Unlimited.  I think it is already better than Rhapsody and it also has a far far greater potential due to the fact that people can write plug-ins for it and because, unlike Rhapsody, the team at Yahoo! Music Engine actually cares.  Not only do they care, they care a lot.  From everything I've seen over the last 2 years as a Rhapsody subscriber, the Real Rhapsody team doesn't care about their subscribers' needs or wants at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would assume that means there is a new version, then.  I wouldn&#8217;t know, I am a Yahoo! Music Unlimited user now.  Fuck Rhapsody.</p>
<p>[UPDATE] A friend of mine called to cancel Rhapsody (to switch to Yahoo!) about a month ago and was told that a new version would be out in a couple weeks and they would extend his subscription for free until the new version came out.  He installed Yahoo! Music Engine anyway, which was a good thing, because the guy who promised him he would get Rhapsody for free until the new version came out apparently lied.</p>
<p>Tell me how the new version is, when you try it. </p>
<p>I still suggest you switch to the cheaper Yahoo! Music Unlimited.  I think it is already better than Rhapsody and it also has a far far greater potential due to the fact that people can write plug-ins for it and because, unlike Rhapsody, the team at Yahoo! Music Engine actually cares.  Not only do they care, they care a lot.  From everything I&#8217;ve seen over the last 2 years as a Rhapsody subscriber, the Real Rhapsody team doesn&#8217;t care about their subscribers&#8217; needs or wants at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://sirshannon.com/2005/04/27/rhapsody-releases-new-version-becomes-napster/#comment-629</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=136#comment-629</guid>
		<description>Is there already (June 22) another new, post version 3, Rhapsody update?  I got a "must update" message when I tried to connect today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there already (June 22) another new, post version 3, Rhapsody update?  I got a &#8220;must update&#8221; message when I tried to connect today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Scott Fischer</title>
		<link>http://sirshannon.com/2005/04/27/rhapsody-releases-new-version-becomes-napster/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Scott Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2005 00:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=136#comment-427</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Real has received enough complaints about 3.0 that they're continuing to make the 2.1 client available, at least for the time being...

http://service.real.com/rhapsody/download/version2/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Real has received enough complaints about 3.0 that they&#8217;re continuing to make the 2.1 client available, at least for the time being&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://service.real.com/rhapsody/download/version2/" rel="nofollow">http://service.real.com/rhapsody/download/version2/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sirshannon.com   &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Yahoo!Unlimited Wins Battle of the Music Services</title>
		<link>http://sirshannon.com/2005/04/27/rhapsody-releases-new-version-becomes-napster/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>sirshannon.com   &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Yahoo!Unlimited Wins Battle of the Music Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=136#comment-444</guid>
		<description>[...] grade unusable and undesirable for me.  Thanks to a comment by Michael Scott Fischer on my &lt;a href="http://sirshannon.com/2005/04/27/rhapsody-releases-new-version-becomes-napster/"&gt;Rhapsody Becomes Napster&lt;/a&gt; post, I was able to uninstall that piece [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] grade unusable and undesirable for me.  Thanks to a comment by Michael Scott Fischer on my <a href="http://sirshannon.com/2005/04/27/rhapsody-releases-new-version-becomes-napster/">Rhapsody Becomes Napster</a> post, I was able to uninstall that piece [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
